Triple
T1779516
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amy Coney Barrett |
E39256
|
entity |
| Predicate | judicialPhilosophy |
P17220
|
FINISHED |
| Object | originalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: originalism | Statement: [Amy Coney Barrett, judicialPhilosophy, originalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialPhilosophy Context triple: [Amy Coney Barrett, judicialPhilosophy, originalism]
-
A.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
-
B.
primaryJurisprudentialSchool
chosen
Indicates the main school of legal or jurisprudential thought with which an entity is affiliated or that it primarily follows.
-
C.
judicialArticle
Indicates that there is a specific legal or judicial article that governs, defines, or is applied to the relationship or action between the entities.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88630519c8190a17addd83c4a3ef4 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab74dc9d1481908084ef07872a71f8 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61cf3ca881908641fd73ce2f7c9d |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:31 p.m.