Triple

T17790120
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Judy Barton E444135 entity
Predicate relationshipToScottieFerguson P128928 FINISHED
Object object of romantic obsession LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: object of romantic obsession | Statement: [Judy Barton, relationshipToScottieFerguson, object of romantic obsession]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToScottieFerguson
Context triple: [Judy Barton, relationshipToScottieFerguson, object of romantic obsession]
  • A. relationshipToJoeBuck
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that one entity has to the person Joe Buck.
  • B. relationshipToLaurie
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Laurie.
  • C. relationshipToTracyLord
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Tracy Lord.
  • D. relationshipToMichelle
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Michelle.
  • E. relationshipToWalterBurns
    Indicates the specific nature of the relationship an entity has with Walter Burns, such as familial, professional, or social connection.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9ef17708190bdf7e2adbf14ddc2 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4879688908190a5428b1fa7525f62 completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3d8d8e538819084f1584426b41d5e completed April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3db7704588190a34a422421152173 completed April 18, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:13 a.m.