Triple
T17789184
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hugues Doneau |
E444107
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Commentarii de iure civili |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Commentarii de iure civili | Statement: [Hugues Doneau, notableWork, Commentarii de iure civili]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Commentarii de iure civili Context triple: [Hugues Doneau, notableWork, Commentarii de iure civili]
-
A.
Commentarius ad Pandectas
Commentarius ad Pandectas is a seminal multi-volume legal commentary on the Roman law Digest that became a foundational work of Roman-Dutch law and influenced civil law systems in Europe and beyond.
-
B.
Commentarii ad Codicem Justiniani
Commentarii ad Codicem Justiniani is a seminal Renaissance-era legal commentary in which Jacques Cujas applied humanist philological methods to clarify and systematize the Roman law contained in Justinian’s Code.
-
C.
Commentarius ad Institutiones Justiniani
Commentarius ad Institutiones Justiniani is a scholarly legal commentary by Dutch jurist Simon van Leeuwen on Justinian’s Institutes, influential in the study of Roman and civil law.
-
D.
System des heutigen römischen Rechts
System des heutigen römischen Rechts is a multi-volume 19th-century legal treatise by Friedrich Karl von Savigny that systematically presents and analyzes the principles of modern Roman (civil) law.
-
E.
Römisches Staatsrecht
Römisches Staatsrecht is a foundational multi-volume scholarly work by Theodor Mommsen that systematically analyzes the constitutional and public law structures of ancient Rome.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Commentarii de iure civili Target entity description: Commentarii de iure civili is a major 16th-century legal treatise by French jurist Hugues Doneau that systematically analyzes and interprets Roman civil law.
-
A.
Commentarius ad Pandectas
Commentarius ad Pandectas is a seminal multi-volume legal commentary on the Roman law Digest that became a foundational work of Roman-Dutch law and influenced civil law systems in Europe and beyond.
-
B.
Commentarii ad Codicem Justiniani
Commentarii ad Codicem Justiniani is a seminal Renaissance-era legal commentary in which Jacques Cujas applied humanist philological methods to clarify and systematize the Roman law contained in Justinian’s Code.
-
C.
Commentarius ad Institutiones Justiniani
Commentarius ad Institutiones Justiniani is a scholarly legal commentary by Dutch jurist Simon van Leeuwen on Justinian’s Institutes, influential in the study of Roman and civil law.
-
D.
System des heutigen römischen Rechts
System des heutigen römischen Rechts is a multi-volume 19th-century legal treatise by Friedrich Karl von Savigny that systematically presents and analyzes the principles of modern Roman (civil) law.
-
E.
Römisches Staatsrecht
Römisches Staatsrecht is a foundational multi-volume scholarly work by Theodor Mommsen that systematically analyzes the constitutional and public law structures of ancient Rome.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9ef17708190bdf7e2adbf14ddc2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4879524bc819090855ab5248c73db |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:12 a.m.