Triple
T17785512
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | La Nona Ora |
E444006
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasArtisticStrategy |
P128909
|
FINISHED |
| Object | shock |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shock | Statement: [La Nona Ora, hasArtisticStrategy, shock]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArtisticStrategy Context triple: [La Nona Ora, hasArtisticStrategy, shock]
-
A.
hasArtisticPolicy
Indicates that an entity maintains or follows a defined set of principles or guidelines governing artistic choices, practices, or direction.
-
B.
hasArtisticFocus
Indicates that an entity’s primary artistic attention, theme, or specialization is directed toward a particular subject, style, or medium.
-
C.
hasArtisticGenre
Indicates that an entity (such as a work or creation) belongs to or is characterized by a particular artistic genre.
-
D.
hasArtDirection
Indicates that one entity is responsible for or associated with the artistic direction or visual style of another entity.
-
E.
hasArtisticAdvisor
Indicates that one entity serves as an artistic advisor, providing artistic guidance or counsel, to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9ef17708190bdf7e2adbf14ddc2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e48792b1c48190836141cfc6656cdd |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3d8d8e538819084f1584426b41d5e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3db7704588190a34a422421152173 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:12 a.m.