Triple
T17764418
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Filioque controversy |
E443465
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasScripturalDebate |
P13860
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interpretation of John 15:26 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interpretation of John 15:26 | Statement: [Filioque controversy, hasScripturalDebate, interpretation of John 15:26]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasScripturalDebate Context triple: [Filioque controversy, hasScripturalDebate, interpretation of John 15:26]
-
A.
scripturalBasisDebated
chosen
Indicates that whether this action or relationship is supported or justified by authoritative religious scriptures is a matter of dispute or disagreement.
-
B.
originDebatedInCanon
Indicates that the character’s or entity’s origin story is discussed with conflicting or unresolved explanations within the official canon.
-
C.
debatedBetween
Indicates a situation in which two or more parties engage in a discussion or argument over differing views about a particular issue or topic.
-
D.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
-
E.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9edf16c8190a59ebd245d378f4f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e485fb2a3c81908887d1d36aee942d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3d8d8e538819084f1584426b41d5e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:11 a.m.