Triple
T17752744
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | QBism |
E443151
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewsQuantumTheoryAs |
P47920
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single-user theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single-user theory | Statement: [QBism, viewsQuantumTheoryAs, single-user theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewsQuantumTheoryAs Context triple: [QBism, viewsQuantumTheoryAs, single-user theory]
-
A.
viewOnTheories
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or expresses a particular perspective, stance, or opinion regarding one or more theories.
-
B.
viewOnThingInItself
Indicates a perspective or interpretation that considers an entity as it is in itself, independent of how it appears or is experienced.
-
C.
concernsTheory
Indicates that something is about or relates specifically to a particular theory or set of theoretical concepts.
-
D.
viewIs
Indicates that one entity is a visual representation or perspective of another entity.
-
E.
viewsKantAs
Indicates that one entity regards or interprets another entity through the philosophical perspective, framework, or doctrines associated with Kant.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9edf16c8190a59ebd245d378f4f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4841c0540819093a32d759775c61f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde9dc288190af0e2198487f2051 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:10 a.m.