Triple

T17752450
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SU(2) E443145 entity
Predicate hasMaximalTorus P78391 FINISHED
Object U(1) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U(1) | Statement: [SU(2), hasMaximalTorus, U(1)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMaximalTorus
Context triple: [SU(2), hasMaximalTorus, U(1)]
  • A. hasMaximalTorusDimension
    Indicates that the associated group or algebraic structure has a maximal torus whose dimension equals the specified value or satisfies a given dimensional property.
  • B. maximalTorus chosen
    Indicates that one group is a maximal torus inside another group, meaning it is a largest possible connected, abelian, diagonalizable subgroup not properly contained in any larger such torus.
  • C. hasMaximalCompactSubgroupOf
    Indicates that one mathematical group is the maximal compact subgroup contained within another group.
  • D. hasMaximalSubgroupOrder
    Indicates that the subgroup in question has the greatest possible order (size) among all proper subgroups of the given group.
  • E. isMaximalSymmetryGroupOf
    Indicates that a group represents the largest possible symmetry group for a given object or structure, such that no strictly larger symmetry group of that object exists containing it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9edf16c8190a59ebd245d378f4f completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4841b3ccc8190b3241b3e0fa4b2e8 completed April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3cde9dc288190af0e2198487f2051 completed April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:10 a.m.