Triple

T17737943
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Villeurbannais E442772 entity
Predicate hasCoordinateTerm P84262 FINISHED
Object Lyonnais LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lyonnais | Statement: [Villeurbannais, hasCoordinateTerm, Lyonnais]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCoordinateTerm
Context triple: [Villeurbannais, hasCoordinateTerm, Lyonnais]
  • A. coordinateTerm chosen
    Indicates that two terms are coordinate concepts at the same hierarchical level, typically sharing a common broader category without one being subordinate to the other.
  • B. hasCoordinates
    Indicates that an entity is associated with specific spatial coordinates that define its position in a given reference system.
  • C. hasCoordinateRole
    Indicates that one entity shares an equivalent or parallel role or function with another entity within the same context or structure.
  • D. hasCoordinateDescription
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a textual or structured description of its spatial or geographic coordinates.
  • E. hasCoordinatesType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or system of coordinates used to define its position.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9ed3a2081909b2ec0d4dd2f4c37 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e47aca27448190943c75e723ceefcc completed April 19, 2026, 6:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3cde815e08190881972e2d80d151e completed April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:09 a.m.