Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: APG II classification | Statement: [APG III classification, predecessor, APG II classification]

Target entity: APG II classification
Context triple: [APG III classification, predecessor, APG II classification]

• A. APG III classification
  APG III classification is a widely used modern system for classifying flowering plants based on molecular phylogenetic evidence, developed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
• B. APG classification series
  The APG classification series is a sequence of modern, phylogeny-based systems for classifying flowering plants developed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
• C. APG IV system
  The APG IV system is the fourth modern classification framework for flowering plants developed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, widely used to organize angiosperm families based on molecular phylogenetic evidence.
• D. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group
  The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group is an international collaboration of botanists that develops and updates widely used classification systems for flowering plants based on molecular phylogenetic evidence.
• E. De Candolle system of plant classification
  The De Candolle system of plant classification is an early 19th-century botanical taxonomy that organized plants based on natural relationships and morphological characteristics, significantly influencing later classification systems.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: APG II classification
Triple: [APG III classification, predecessor, APG II classification]

APG II classification is an earlier version of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group’s modern, DNA-based system for classifying flowering plants.

Target entity: APG II classification
Target entity description: APG II classification is an earlier version of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group’s modern, DNA-based system for classifying flowering plants.

• A. APG III classification
  APG III classification is a widely used modern system for classifying flowering plants based on molecular phylogenetic evidence, developed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
• B. APG classification series chosen
  The APG classification series is a sequence of modern, phylogeny-based systems for classifying flowering plants developed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group.
• C. APG IV system
  The APG IV system is the fourth modern classification framework for flowering plants developed by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, widely used to organize angiosperm families based on molecular phylogenetic evidence.
• D. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group
  The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group is an international collaboration of botanists that develops and updates widely used classification systems for flowering plants based on molecular phylogenetic evidence.
• E. De Candolle system of plant classification
  The De Candolle system of plant classification is an early 19th-century botanical taxonomy that organized plants based on natural relationships and morphological characteristics, significantly influencing later classification systems.
• F. None of above.