Triple
T17713001
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Heracleon |
E441616
|
entity |
| Predicate | exegeticalMethod |
P18616
|
FINISHED |
| Object | allegorical interpretation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: allegorical interpretation | Statement: [Heracleon, exegeticalMethod, allegorical interpretation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exegeticalMethod Context triple: [Heracleon, exegeticalMethod, allegorical interpretation]
-
A.
styleOfExegesis
chosen
Indicates the particular interpretive method or approach applied when analyzing or explaining a text.
-
B.
scripturalExpertise
Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses specialized knowledge or authoritative understanding of religious scriptures in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
doctrinalCriticismBy
Indicates that a person or group expresses critical evaluation or disapproval of another’s doctrines, teachings, or belief system.
-
D.
scripturalCorpusAnalyzed
Indicates that a particular scriptural corpus has been examined or studied, typically in a systematic or scholarly manner.
-
E.
scriptureApproach
Indicates the method, attitude, or interpretive framework with which an entity engages with or understands scripture.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9ea20b48190ace88bb46b01e6a9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4729c2c98819086fe48420217308d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde601d4819097903f471f1fe99a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:06 a.m.