Triple
T17685613
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Guardian of the Universe |
E440879
|
entity |
| Predicate | impliesAlignment |
P128572
|
FINISHED |
| Object | heroic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: heroic | Statement: [Guardian of the Universe, impliesAlignment, heroic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impliesAlignment Context triple: [Guardian of the Universe, impliesAlignment, heroic]
-
A.
requiresAlignment
Indicates that one entity depends on another entity being properly aligned or brought into a specified alignment condition before the relationship or action can occur.
-
B.
hasAlignment
Indicates that one entity shares or exhibits a particular orientation, stance, or compatibility in relation to another entity or standard.
-
C.
supportsAlignment
Indicates that one entity is compatible with and can properly function or operate in conjunction with a specified alignment, configuration, or standard.
-
D.
alignsWith
Indicates that one entity is in agreement, harmony, or consistent correspondence with another in terms of position, direction, standard, or principle.
-
E.
followsAlignmentOf
Indicates that one entity adopts or conforms to the alignment, orientation, or positioning established by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e940b081908b862bb0e6e89b0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e47047d90c8190a172201f3de6db87 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde3673c8190a889e14ba1f07dc1 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3cfaac2b881909e1140339eb1a0dd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:02 a.m.