Triple
T17677269
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver |
E440671
|
entity |
| Predicate | IPAddress |
P98689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1.1.1.1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1.1.1.1 | Statement: [1.1.1.1 DNS resolver, IPAddress, 1.1.1.1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: IPAddress Context triple: [1.1.1.1 DNS resolver, IPAddress, 1.1.1.1]
-
A.
hasIP
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, is assigned, or is associated with a specific IP address.
-
B.
networkHost
Indicates that one entity serves as the host machine or node on which another networked entity (such as a service, application, or connection) resides or operates.
-
C.
addressFamily
Indicates the type of network address family (such as IPv4 or IPv6) associated with or used by an entity in a communication context.
-
D.
addressAllocation
Indicates the assignment or reservation of an address (such as an IP or memory address) for use by a specific entity or resource.
-
E.
locationRelativeToIP
Indicates a spatial or geographic relationship between an entity and a given IP address’s inferred location.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e940b081908b862bb0e6e89b0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46f6e959c819092d9d33e79bd51f7 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde007d8819090dd92eea9f022cc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:01 a.m.