Triple
T17676143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ruby-install |
E440646
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalInstallationMethod |
P60294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | package manager |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: package manager | Statement: [ruby-install, typicalInstallationMethod, package manager]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalInstallationMethod Context triple: [ruby-install, typicalInstallationMethod, package manager]
-
A.
typicalInstallMethod
chosen
Indicates the usual or most common method by which something is installed or set up.
-
B.
typeOfInstallation
Indicates the specific kind or category of installation associated with an entity (e.g., how or in what form something is installed).
-
C.
intendedInstallation
Indicates that one entity is meant or planned to be installed in, on, or as part of another entity or environment.
-
D.
controlledInstallation
Indicates that an entity has authoritative oversight or management responsibility over the setup, configuration, or deployment of another entity.
-
E.
typicalSetup
Indicates that an entity is arranged, configured, or organized in its standard or commonly used setup relative to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e940b081908b862bb0e6e89b0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46f6d9ab88190ab0e25eac8b0101c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde007d8819090dd92eea9f022cc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10 a.m.