Triple

T17675789
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ERB E440638 entity
Predicate supportsControlFlow P3686 FINISHED
Object if statements in templates LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: if statements in templates | Statement: [ERB, supportsControlFlow, if statements in templates]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsControlFlow
Context triple: [ERB, supportsControlFlow, if statements in templates]
  • A. controlStructure
    Indicates a relationship where one entity governs, regulates, or directs the behavior, operation, or flow of another entity or process.
  • B. continuesToControl
    Indicates that one entity maintains ongoing authority, influence, or command over another entity or resource over time.
  • C. flowControl chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity regulates, directs, or manages the rate or sequence of another entity’s operations or movement.
  • D. supportsJobControlLanguage
    Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with or the ability to execute and manage operations defined in a job control language for another entity.
  • E. controlledFor
    Indicates that the influence or effect of a specified factor has been accounted for or neutralized when assessing the relationship between other variables or entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9e87e18819087104a44dc4dc5b1 completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e46f6cca54819094ea0bed1517724e completed April 19, 2026, 6 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3cde007d8819090dd92eea9f022cc completed April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10 a.m.