Triple
T17675787
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ERB |
E440638
|
entity |
| Predicate | outputSyntax |
P25612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ruby expression inside <%= %> delimiters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ruby expression inside <%= %> delimiters | Statement: [ERB, outputSyntax, Ruby expression inside <%= %> delimiters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: outputSyntax Context triple: [ERB, outputSyntax, Ruby expression inside <%= %> delimiters]
-
A.
outputSpecifier
Indicates how the result or outcome of an action, process, or computation is to be formatted, structured, or delivered.
-
B.
outputConfiguration
Indicates how the results or data produced by a process, system, or component are structured, formatted, or directed to their destination.
-
C.
outputOf
Indicates that one entity is the result or product generated by the processing, operation, or behavior of another entity.
-
D.
syntaxStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic or structural conventions used in the form or arrangement of an expression, statement, or code.
-
E.
outputDescription
Indicates that an entity produces or generates a particular description as its output.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e87e18819087104a44dc4dc5b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46f6cca54819094ea0bed1517724e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cde007d8819090dd92eea9f022cc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10 a.m.