Triple
T17674285
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Van Wijngaarden grammars |
E440604
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | meta-grammar formalism |
C2121
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: meta-grammar formalism Context triple: [Van Wijngaarden grammars, instanceOf, meta-grammar formalism]
-
A.
formal grammar notation
A formal grammar notation is a precise symbolic system for defining the syntactic structure of languages by specifying how valid strings can be generated from a set of production rules.
-
B.
formal language specification
A formal language specification is a precise, mathematically defined description of the syntax and structure of a language, typically using grammars and formal rules to unambiguously determine which strings belong to the language.
-
C.
hierarchy of formal grammars
A hierarchy of formal grammars is an organized classification of grammars into levels based on their generative power and structural constraints, such as the Chomsky hierarchy from regular to recursively enumerable languages.
-
D.
metalanguage
chosen
A metalanguage is a language or formal system used to describe, analyze, or define another language (the object language), including its syntax, semantics, and rules.
-
E.
lexical grammar
Lexical grammar is the set of rules that define how characters in a language’s source code are grouped into meaningful tokens such as identifiers, keywords, literals, and operators.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9e87e18819087104a44dc4dc5b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10 a.m.