Triple

T17655335
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kuřim E429606 entity
Predicate hasRegionalCodeNUTS3 P2415 FINISHED
Object CZ064 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CZ064 | Statement: [Kuřim, hasRegionalCodeNUTS3, CZ064]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRegionalCodeNUTS3
Context triple: [Kuřim, hasRegionalCodeNUTS3, CZ064]
  • A. NUTSRegionCode chosen
    Indicates the classification of an entity according to the NUTS (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) regional coding system used for statistical regions.
  • B. hasThirdLevelAdministrativeTerritory
    Indicates that an entity possesses or encompasses a third-level administrative territory within its hierarchical territorial organization.
  • C. hasISO3166Alpha3Code
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific three-letter country code defined by the ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 standard.
  • D. subregionCodeFor
    Indicates that one entity is the code assigned to identify a specific subregion of the other entity.
  • E. inseeCode
    Indicates the official INSEE (French national statistics institute) code assigned to an entity, typically identifying a specific geographic or administrative unit.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e46e40e344819086a49c69f8f2956b completed April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 completed April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:06 a.m.