Triple
T17655320
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kuřim |
E429606
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTwinTown |
P919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pińczów |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pińczów | Statement: [Kuřim, hasTwinTown, Pińczów]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pińczów Context triple: [Kuřim, hasTwinTown, Pińczów]
-
A.
Pińczów
chosen
Pińczów is a historic town in south-central Poland known for its Renaissance architecture and scenic location in the Nida River valley.
-
B.
Korczyna
Korczyna is a village in southeastern Poland, known as a local administrative and residential center within the Subcarpathian region.
-
C.
Pszczyna
Pszczyna is a historic town in southern Poland known for its well-preserved castle complex and picturesque old town.
-
D.
Goleszów
Goleszów is a village in southern Poland that serves as the seat of Gmina Goleszów in the Silesian Voivodeship.
-
E.
Czernichów
Czernichów is a village in southern Poland that serves as the seat of its namesake rural administrative district within the Kraków metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46e40e344819086a49c69f8f2956b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:06 a.m.