Triple
T17653887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oenopion |
E429564
|
entity |
| Predicate | mythologicalIsland |
P128399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chios |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chios | Statement: [Oenopion, mythologicalIsland, Chios]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mythologicalIsland Context triple: [Oenopion, mythologicalIsland, Chios]
-
A.
mythologicalLocation
Indicates that the subject is a place or setting that exists within mythology, legends, or folklore rather than in historical or physical reality.
-
B.
mythicalBirthplaceOf
Indicates the legendary or mythological location where an entity is said to have originated or been born.
-
C.
mythologicalSetting
Indicates that an entity is set within, associated with, or takes place in a mythological or legendary context.
-
D.
relatedMythicalPlace
Indicates that one entity has an association or connection with a mythical or legendary place in relation to the other entity.
-
E.
relatedMythicalPlace
Indicates that one entity has an association or connection with a mythical or legendary place represented by the other entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46e3ed8b08190a00efdad9740bf6f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3cfaac2b881909e1140339eb1a0dd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:05 a.m.