Triple
T17647591
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Eisenbud |
E429400
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sheaf Theory |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sheaf Theory | Statement: [David Eisenbud, notableWork, Sheaf Theory]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sheaf Theory Context triple: [David Eisenbud, notableWork, Sheaf Theory]
-
A.
Grothendieck topology
A Grothendieck topology is an abstract framework in category theory that generalizes the notion of open covers in topology to define sheaves on arbitrary categories.
-
B.
Sheaves in Geometry and Logic
Sheaves in Geometry and Logic is a foundational monograph that develops the theory of sheaves and topos theory and explores their deep connections to geometry, logic, and the foundations of mathematics.
-
C.
Grothendieck toposes
Grothendieck toposes are highly structured categories that generalize topological spaces and serve as a unifying framework for geometry, logic, and cohomology in modern mathematics.
-
D.
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework is a foundational reformulation of algebraic geometry that generalizes varieties using schemes, enabling powerful tools like sheaf theory, cohomology, and modern number-theoretic applications.
-
E.
Grothendieck duality
Grothendieck duality is a foundational theory in algebraic geometry that generalizes classical Serre duality to a broad categorical and sheaf-theoretic framework for studying duality on schemes and morphisms.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sheaf Theory Target entity description: Sheaf Theory is a branch of modern mathematics that studies how local data on spaces can be systematically organized and “glued” together, playing a central role in areas such as algebraic geometry, topology, and category theory.
-
A.
Grothendieck topology
A Grothendieck topology is an abstract framework in category theory that generalizes the notion of open covers in topology to define sheaves on arbitrary categories.
-
B.
Sheaves in Geometry and Logic
Sheaves in Geometry and Logic is a foundational monograph that develops the theory of sheaves and topos theory and explores their deep connections to geometry, logic, and the foundations of mathematics.
-
C.
Grothendieck toposes
Grothendieck toposes are highly structured categories that generalize topological spaces and serve as a unifying framework for geometry, logic, and cohomology in modern mathematics.
-
D.
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework is a foundational reformulation of algebraic geometry that generalizes varieties using schemes, enabling powerful tools like sheaf theory, cohomology, and modern number-theoretic applications.
-
E.
Grothendieck duality
Grothendieck duality is a foundational theory in algebraic geometry that generalizes classical Serre duality to a broad categorical and sheaf-theoretic framework for studying duality on schemes and morphisms.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46e3a5ad8819085d4bef669fc3152 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:05 a.m.