Triple
T17646922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bush–Cheney 2000 campaign |
E429380
|
entity |
| Predicate | ballotAccessState |
P118476
|
FINISHED |
| Object | all 50 U.S. states |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: all 50 U.S. states | Statement: [Bush–Cheney 2000 campaign, ballotAccessState, all 50 U.S. states]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ballotAccessState Context triple: [Bush–Cheney 2000 campaign, ballotAccessState, all 50 U.S. states]
-
A.
ballotAccessRegulatedBy
Indicates that the rules or conditions for appearing on an election ballot are controlled, governed, or determined by a particular authority or regulation.
-
B.
ballotAccessMethod
Indicates the method or process by which a candidate, party, or measure qualifies to appear on an election ballot.
-
C.
ballotStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of a ballot within a voting or decision-making process.
-
D.
hasBallotAccessFor
chosen
Indicates that an entity is permitted or qualified to appear on the ballot for a particular election or jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasBallotAccessHistory
Indicates that there exists a record of an entity’s past or current eligibility or status for appearing on an official ballot.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46e39937881909bb6a1792fff39a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:04 a.m.