Triple
T17639885
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aargau cantonal court |
E429195
|
entity |
| Predicate | isAppealInstanceFor |
P46916
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lower courts in the Canton of Aargau |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lower courts in the Canton of Aargau | Statement: [Aargau cantonal court, isAppealInstanceFor, lower courts in the Canton of Aargau]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAppealInstanceFor Context triple: [Aargau cantonal court, isAppealInstanceFor, lower courts in the Canton of Aargau]
-
A.
appellateInstance
chosen
Indicates that one legal proceeding or court serves as the appellate (reviewing) instance for another lower-level decision or case.
-
B.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
C.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
appealStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
-
E.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46de3f2a08190998641fa589bad78 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:02 a.m.