Triple
T17639874
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aargau cantonal court |
E429195
|
entity |
| Predicate | highestJudicialAuthorityOf |
P6120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canton of Aargau |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Canton of Aargau | Statement: [Aargau cantonal court, highestJudicialAuthorityOf, Canton of Aargau]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: highestJudicialAuthorityOf Context triple: [Aargau cantonal court, highestJudicialAuthorityOf, Canton of Aargau]
-
A.
highestCourtOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
B.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
C.
judicialHead
Indicates that one entity serves as the chief or leading judicial authority over another entity, such as a court or legal body.
-
D.
highestCourtType
Indicates the type or category of the supreme or top-level court that has ultimate judicial authority over a given jurisdiction or case.
-
E.
officeHoldsInHighestCourtOf
Indicates that an entity holds an official position or role within the highest court of a specified jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e2c2608190b762e76d9b2262f1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46de3f2a08190998641fa589bad78 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 6:02 a.m.