Triple
T17635419
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alresford railway station |
E430080
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStationCodeHistoric |
P75590
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ARS |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ARS | Statement: [Alresford railway station, hasStationCodeHistoric, ARS]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStationCodeHistoric Context triple: [Alresford railway station, hasStationCodeHistoric, ARS]
-
A.
hasStationCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific station identification code.
-
B.
hasStationCodeSystem
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular system for assigning or managing station codes.
-
C.
hasStationCodeInternal
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific internal station code used within a system or organization.
-
D.
hasFormerStation
Indicates that an entity previously had a particular station (e.g., a stop, depot, or facility) that is no longer in active use or part of its current infrastructure.
-
E.
formerStationCode
chosen
Indicates that an entity previously had a specific station code that is no longer in current use.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e37f308190a6aa0a69daff86c7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e46de0ad988190b1a2c0bff69eb9f1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3cddc87188190ac2f049b86038676 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:52 a.m.