Triple

T17597622
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wang Ming E428613 entity
Predicate alignmentWithinCCP P16437 FINISHED
Object pro‑Moscow line LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pro‑Moscow line | Statement: [Wang Ming, alignmentWithinCCP, pro‑Moscow line]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentWithinCCP
Context triple: [Wang Ming, alignmentWithinCCP, pro‑Moscow line]
  • A. alignmentComponents
    Indicates that one entity is composed of or associated with specific subparts or elements that together form its overall alignment.
  • B. alignmentConcept chosen
    Indicates a conceptual or abstract relationship of alignment or correspondence between entities, such as agreement, compatibility, or shared orientation in some dimension.
  • C. alignmentMethod
    Indicates the technique or procedure used to align one entity with another or with a reference standard.
  • D. alignmentShape
    Indicates that one entity’s shape is arranged, oriented, or matched in position relative to another entity’s shape.
  • E. alignmentGoal
    Indicates that an entity has a desired or target alignment state it aims to achieve or maintain.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e1030481909950e140c63255b9 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e469ecfb108190a9e7a5b380f8ab93 completed April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4fff0348190b899a32da537eaca completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:51 a.m.