Triple
T17592246
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eastern Kʼicheʼ |
E428475
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of the Kʼicheʼ language |
C39403
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of the Kʼicheʼ language Context triple: [Eastern Kʼicheʼ, instanceOf, regional variety of the Kʼicheʼ language]
-
A.
Kaqchikel language variety
The Kaqchikel language variety is a Mayan language spoken primarily in the central highlands of Guatemala, characterized by its agglutinative morphology, ergative-absolutive alignment, and rich system of aspect and status markers.
-
B.
Mazatec language variety
A Mazatec language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Mazatec language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Mazatecan linguistic continuum.
-
C.
Totonac language variety
A Totonac language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Totonac language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Totonacan language family.
-
D.
Amuzgo language variety
An Amuzgo language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Amuzgo language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Amuzgo linguistic continuum.
-
E.
regional variety of Guna language
A regional variety of the Guna language is a geographically or socially distinct form of Guna characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other Guna varieties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e1030481909950e140c63255b9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:51 a.m.