Triple

T17579918
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paik Sun-yup E428173 entity
Predicate notableBattle P259 FINISHED
Object Battle of Tabu-dong NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Battle of Tabu-dong | Statement: [Paik Sun-yup, notableBattle, Battle of Tabu-dong]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battle of Tabu-dong
Context triple: [Paik Sun-yup, notableBattle, Battle of Tabu-dong]
  • A. Battle of Seonghwan
    The Battle of Seonghwan was an early land engagement in 1894 during the First Sino-Japanese War in which Japanese forces defeated Chinese troops near Asan in Korea, helping secure Japanese control over the Korean Peninsula.
  • B. Battle of Onjong
    The Battle of Onjong was an early Korean War clash in October 1950 in which Chinese forces first engaged United Nations troops, marking the beginning of large-scale Chinese intervention in the conflict.
  • C. Battle of Wonju
    The Battle of Wonju was a key engagement of the Korean War in early 1951, where United Nations forces halted Chinese and North Korean advances in central South Korea.
  • D. Battle of Maryang San
    The Battle of Maryang San was a significant Korean War engagement in October 1951 in which Commonwealth forces, notably Australian troops, captured key high ground from Chinese forces in a hard-fought offensive.
  • E. Battle of Baengma-goji
    The Battle of Baengma-goji, also known as the Battle of White Horse, was a fierce and pivotal Korean War engagement in 1952 in which United Nations forces, primarily South Korean troops, repeatedly repelled Chinese assaults to hold a strategically vital hill.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battle of Tabu-dong
Target entity description: The Battle of Tabu-dong was a key engagement during the Korean War in 1950, where United Nations and South Korean forces fought to halt the North Korean advance toward the vital city of Daegu.
  • A. Battle of Seonghwan
    The Battle of Seonghwan was an early land engagement in 1894 during the First Sino-Japanese War in which Japanese forces defeated Chinese troops near Asan in Korea, helping secure Japanese control over the Korean Peninsula.
  • B. Battle of Onjong
    The Battle of Onjong was an early Korean War clash in October 1950 in which Chinese forces first engaged United Nations troops, marking the beginning of large-scale Chinese intervention in the conflict.
  • C. Battle of Wonju
    The Battle of Wonju was a key engagement of the Korean War in early 1951, where United Nations forces halted Chinese and North Korean advances in central South Korea.
  • D. Battle of Maryang San
    The Battle of Maryang San was a significant Korean War engagement in October 1951 in which Commonwealth forces, notably Australian troops, captured key high ground from Chinese forces in a hard-fought offensive.
  • E. Battle of Baengma-goji
    The Battle of Baengma-goji, also known as the Battle of White Horse, was a fierce and pivotal Korean War engagement in 1952 in which United Nations forces, primarily South Korean troops, repeatedly repelled Chinese assaults to hold a strategically vital hill.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e1030481909950e140c63255b9 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e463cc493c8190965680cf786aa531 completed April 19, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.