Triple
T17573603
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | east-central Georgia |
E428000
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sandersville, Georgia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sandersville, Georgia | Statement: [east-central Georgia, hasCity, Sandersville, Georgia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sandersville, Georgia Context triple: [east-central Georgia, hasCity, Sandersville, Georgia]
-
A.
Sandersville, Georgia
chosen
Sandersville, Georgia is a small city in central Georgia known historically for its kaolin mining industry and role as the county seat of Washington County.
-
B.
Plainville, Georgia
Plainville, Georgia is a small rural city located in northwestern Georgia within Gordon County.
-
C.
Sylvania, Georgia
Sylvania, Georgia is a small city in Screven County known as the county seat and a historic community in eastern Georgia.
-
D.
Smithville, Georgia
Smithville, Georgia is a small rural city located in Lee County in the southwestern part of the state.
-
E.
Farmington, Georgia
Farmington, Georgia is a small unincorporated rural community located in Oconee County in the U.S. state of Georgia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e459330c788190907a02fc98e0e24b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.