Triple
T17569393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Equatable |
E427894
|
entity |
| Predicate | conformanceStyle |
P128061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | explicit conformance declaration required |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: explicit conformance declaration required | Statement: [Equatable, conformanceStyle, explicit conformance declaration required]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conformanceStyle Context triple: [Equatable, conformanceStyle, explicit conformance declaration required]
-
A.
passingStyle
Indicates the manner or technique by which something (typically a ball or object) is passed from one entity to another.
-
B.
structuralStyle
Indicates the architectural or design style that characterizes the structure or form of an entity.
-
C.
usesConformanceLevels
Indicates that one entity applies or adheres to defined conformance levels when interacting with or evaluating another entity.
-
D.
conformsTo
Indicates that one entity complies with, follows, or is in accordance with a specified standard, specification, rule, or guideline.
-
E.
styleOfRule
Indicates the stylistic or formatting convention that a particular rule follows or is expressed in.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4592fe8408190bd8fed1920ab3601 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4fd7d048190b54ee4c6155612a5 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3bbb50b448190a59dd4be33c76db7 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.