Triple
T17569307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | BidirectionalCollection |
E427892
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresIndicesToForm |
P128051
|
FINISHED |
| Object | a finite range |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: a finite range | Statement: [BidirectionalCollection, requiresIndicesToForm, a finite range]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresIndicesToForm Context triple: [BidirectionalCollection, requiresIndicesToForm, a finite range]
-
A.
raisesIndicesOf
Indicates that one entity increases or elevates the index values or positions associated with another entity.
-
B.
isFormedFor
Indicates that something is created, established, or brought into existence for a particular purpose, function, or beneficiary.
-
C.
requiredTo
Indicates that one entity has an obligation or necessity to perform an action or satisfy a condition in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
requiresComplement
Indicates that one entity depends on another entity as a necessary complement to be complete, functional, or valid.
-
E.
requiresRepresentationBy
Indicates that one entity must be represented or acted for by another entity, typically in a formal, legal, or official capacity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4592f29d08190bc3de905d35af849 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4fd7d048190b54ee4c6155612a5 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3bbb50b448190a59dd4be33c76db7 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.