Triple

T17561225
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ST_Within E427698 entity
Predicate acceptsArgumentType P125616 FINISHED
Object geometry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: geometry | Statement: [ST_Within, acceptsArgumentType, geometry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: acceptsArgumentType
Context triple: [ST_Within, acceptsArgumentType, geometry]
  • A. argumentType
    Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
  • B. hasArgument
    Indicates that one entity serves as an argument (such as an input, parameter, or participant) in relation to another entity, typically a function, event, or statement.
  • C. constructorAccepts
    Indicates that a constructor takes a specified parameter or set of parameters as part of its definition.
  • D. hasParameterType chosen
    Indicates that a parameter in a function, method, or operation is associated with a specific data type.
  • E. laterAccepts
    Indicates that one entity accepts, approves, or agrees to something at a time subsequent to a referenced earlier point or event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e456267e208190a1238fbe1a535bb0 completed April 19, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4fb39948190a82a597c5bac5c57 completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.