Triple

T17560618
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PostgreSQL License E427686 entity
Predicate allowsPatentUse P127949 FINISHED
Object implicitly, no explicit patent grant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: implicitly, no explicit patent grant | Statement: [PostgreSQL License, allowsPatentUse, implicitly, no explicit patent grant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowsPatentUse
Context triple: [PostgreSQL License, allowsPatentUse, implicitly, no explicit patent grant]
  • A. usedPatent
    Indicates that one entity has made practical or commercial use of a patent owned or associated with another entity.
  • B. eligibleUses
    Indicates the types of actions, purposes, or contexts in which something is permitted or qualified to be used.
  • C. allows
    Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
  • D. allowsSublicensing
    Indicates that one party grants another the right to further license the same rights to additional third parties.
  • E. isPatentEncumbered
    Indicates that the subject is restricted or burdened by existing patent rights that limit its free use, distribution, or implementation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e456267e208190a1238fbe1a535bb0 completed April 19, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4fb39948190a82a597c5bac5c57 completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3bbb50b448190a59dd4be33c76db7 completed April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.