Triple
T17558872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Veritas File System |
E427649
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high-performance file system |
C39324
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: high-performance file system Context triple: [Veritas File System, instanceOf, high-performance file system]
-
A.
Fast File System variant
A Fast File System variant is a modified implementation of the original Fast File System that adjusts layout, allocation, or metadata strategies to improve performance, reliability, or compatibility for specific operating systems or storage environments.
-
B.
flash-friendly file system
A flash-friendly file system is a storage management system designed to optimize performance, wear leveling, and reliability on flash memory devices by minimizing random writes and efficiently handling erase-block constraints.
-
C.
Unix-like file system
A Unix-like file system is a hierarchical, tree-structured organization of files and directories that provides standardized interfaces and semantics for storing, accessing, and managing data on Unix and Unix-inspired operating systems.
-
D.
proprietary file system
A proprietary file system is a data storage and retrieval format whose design, specifications, and implementation details are controlled and typically restricted by a single company or entity.
-
E.
journaling file system
A journaling file system is a type of file system that records changes to a dedicated log (journal) before committing them to the main file system, improving reliability and recovery after crashes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889e0385081908a04b66f4dd4bd0d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.