Triple

T17557119
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject distutils E427616 entity
Predicate supportsMetadataField P13797 FINISHED
Object name LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: name | Statement: [distutils, supportsMetadataField, name]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsMetadataField
Context triple: [distutils, supportsMetadataField, name]
  • A. hasMetadata
    Indicates that one entity is associated with descriptive or informational data about another entity.
  • B. dynamicMetadataSupport
    Indicates that the subject system or component is capable of handling metadata that can change or be updated at runtime rather than being fixed or static.
  • C. supportsField chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides the necessary structure, stability, or backing for a particular field, area, or domain associated with another entity.
  • D. hasMetaSubject
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject at a meta-level, such as the topic, theme, or aboutness of the entity rather than its direct content or participants.
  • E. supportsExtensionModel
    Indicates that one entity provides compatibility or functionality for using a specified extension model associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889df6dc081908f67dbadc03c07ee completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4562413d08190acaa5272046d3626 completed April 19, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4fb39948190a82a597c5bac5c57 completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:50 a.m.