Triple

T17546522
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Saxman, Alaska E427339 entity
Predicate hasLanguage P15 FINISHED
Object Tlingit language NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tlingit language | Statement: [Saxman, Alaska, hasLanguage, Tlingit language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tlingit language
Context triple: [Saxman, Alaska, hasLanguage, Tlingit language]
  • A. Eyak language
    The Eyak language is an extinct Na-Dené language once spoken by the Eyak people of south-central Alaska, now primarily documented through linguistic records and revitalization efforts.
  • B. Tlingit chosen
    Tlingit is an Indigenous language of the Pacific Northwest Coast, traditionally spoken by the Tlingit people of southeastern Alaska and western Canada.
  • C. Dena’ina language
    The Dena’ina language is an Athabaskan Indigenous language traditionally spoken by the Dena’ina people of south-central Alaska, including the Cook Inlet region.
  • D. Tutchone language
    The Tutchone language is an Indigenous Northern Athabaskan language spoken by the Tutchone people of central Yukon in Canada.
  • E. Ahtna language
    The Ahtna language is an Athabaskan language traditionally spoken by the Ahtna people of south-central Alaska, particularly around the Copper River region.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889df6dc081908f67dbadc03c07ee completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e45461643881909b106bafb89253b3 completed April 19, 2026, 4:04 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:49 a.m.