Triple
T17531219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hidalgo County |
E426936
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Progreso Lakes, Texas |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Progreso Lakes, Texas | Statement: [Hidalgo County, contains, Progreso Lakes, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Progreso Lakes, Texas Context triple: [Hidalgo County, contains, Progreso Lakes, Texas]
-
A.
Progreso Lakes, Texas
chosen
Progreso Lakes, Texas is a small city in Hidalgo County located in the Rio Grande Valley region of South Texas near the U.S.–Mexico border.
-
B.
Cedar Lake, Texas
Cedar Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Yoakum County in West Texas.
-
C.
Cedar Lake, Texas
Cedar Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Garza County in the U.S. state of Texas.
-
D.
Lake Pflugerville
Lake Pflugerville is a man-made reservoir and popular recreational lake in Pflugerville, Texas, known for activities like swimming, fishing, and kayaking.
-
E.
Lake Worth, Texas
Lake Worth, Texas is a small suburban city in Tarrant County, part of the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889de677081909b22d2657b1f0292 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e453688950819098162d853cd2674e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:49 a.m.