Triple

T17521213
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject REINFORCE E426681 entity
Predicate commonImplementation P3697 FINISHED
Object neural network policy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: neural network policy | Statement: [REINFORCE, commonImplementation, neural network policy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonImplementation
Context triple: [REINFORCE, commonImplementation, neural network policy]
  • A. commonlyImplementedBy chosen
    Indicates that the referenced item (e.g., a standard, interface, or pattern) is frequently realized or put into practice by the associated implementing entities.
  • B. exampleImplementation
    Indicates that one entity serves as a concrete, illustrative implementation or instance of another, more general concept, design, or specification.
  • C. commonIn
    Indicates that something frequently occurs, appears, or is found within a specified context, group, or environment.
  • D. commonOn
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same location, context, or medium where they are present or occur together.
  • E. commonFor
    Indicates that something is typical, usual, or frequently occurring for a given entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889de677081909b22d2657b1f0292 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e452d2f79881909556894728e255ab completed April 19, 2026, 3:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4f8b9888190aa8a45e09acf4319 completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:49 a.m.