Triple
T17521185
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TD3 |
E426680
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticTargetComputation |
P58146
|
FINISHED |
| Object | minimum of twin target Q-values |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: minimum of twin target Q-values | Statement: [TD3, criticTargetComputation, minimum of twin target Q-values]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticTargetComputation Context triple: [TD3, criticTargetComputation, minimum of twin target Q-values]
-
A.
targetComputation
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one computation is designated or identified as the specific goal, focus, or intended result among possible computations.
-
B.
criticObjective
Indicates that an entity serves as the target or focus of a critic’s evaluation, commentary, or judgment.
-
C.
outputOfCritic
Indicates that something is the result or product generated by a critic (e.g., a critique, evaluation, or feedback output).
-
D.
goalOfCritique
Indicates that a critique is directed toward achieving or serving a particular goal or purpose.
-
E.
criticOutputs
Indicates that a critic produces or provides an evaluative response, judgment, or commentary about a target.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889de677081909b22d2657b1f0292 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e452d2f79881909556894728e255ab |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4f8b9888190aa8a45e09acf4319 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:49 a.m.