Triple
T17518691
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minor Swing |
E426629
|
entity |
| Predicate | lyricStatus |
P127756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | instrumental |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: instrumental | Statement: [Minor Swing, lyricStatus, instrumental]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lyricStatus Context triple: [Minor Swing, lyricStatus, instrumental]
-
A.
hasLyric
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
-
B.
lyricType
Indicates the specific category or role that a lyric plays within a musical or lyrical work (e.g., verse, chorus, bridge).
-
C.
lyricsBy
Indicates that the lyrics of a song or musical work were written or authored by a specified person or entity.
-
D.
hasLyricsIn
Indicates that the lyrics of a work are written or available in a specified language.
-
E.
lyricFocus
Indicates that the primary emphasis or subject of the lyrics is centered on a particular entity or theme.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dd9164819087b1dc3c9240c870 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e452d0daa48190be69aff32b0324bc |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4f8b9888190aa8a45e09acf4319 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3bbb37d148190b7f38599c06594ee |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:49 a.m.