Triple

T1750413
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Operation Mondscheinsonate E38426 entity
Predicate hasCodeNameLanguage P11283 FINISHED
Object German LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German | Statement: [Operation Mondscheinsonate, hasCodeNameLanguage, German]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCodeNameLanguage
Context triple: [Operation Mondscheinsonate, hasCodeNameLanguage, German]
  • A. hasCodeName
    Indicates that an entity is known or referred to by a particular alternative name or alias, often used for secrecy or distinction.
  • B. hasCodenameLanguage chosen
    Indicates that a codename is expressed or defined in a particular language.
  • C. hasLinguisticCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific linguistic identifier or code (such as a language or script code) that characterizes its linguistic properties.
  • D. hasLinguasphereCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific Linguasphere code that identifies its language or linguistic variety within the Linguasphere classification system.
  • E. hasFourLetterCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a code consisting of exactly four characters.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8862bdb2081908aefe831c8aa8017 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aba6a63f588190b53b39c6b97d74f4 completed March 7, 2026, 4:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61c7ef4c8190abec87c96a787d82 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:31 p.m.