Triple
T17495564
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pays d’Olmes |
E426048
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Laroque-d’Olmes |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Laroque-d’Olmes | Statement: [Pays d’Olmes, contains, Laroque-d’Olmes]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Laroque-d’Olmes Context triple: [Pays d’Olmes, contains, Laroque-d’Olmes]
-
A.
Laroque-d’Olmes
chosen
Laroque-d’Olmes is a commune in the Ariège department in southwestern France, known for its location in the historical region of Occitanie.
-
B.
Montauroux
Montauroux is a picturesque commune in southeastern France’s Var department, known for its hilltop setting overlooking the Pays de Fayence and proximity to the French Riviera.
-
C.
Roquemaure
Roquemaure is a historic wine-producing commune in southern France, situated on the right bank of the Rhône River opposite the Châteauneuf-du-Pape area.
-
D.
Olbreuse
Olbreuse is a small locality in western France historically notable as the ancestral seat of the noble d’Olbreuse family.
-
E.
Olliergues
Olliergues is a small commune in central France’s Puy-de-Dôme department, known for its rural setting in the Auvergne region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dccf7481909264a1844a2e9100 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4520dd9508190872a71d3722228e2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.