Triple

T17494965
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Te Awa Tupua E426031 entity
Predicate hasGuardianAppointment P127664 FINISHED
Object jointly appointed by the Crown and iwi LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: jointly appointed by the Crown and iwi | Statement: [Te Awa Tupua, hasGuardianAppointment, jointly appointed by the Crown and iwi]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGuardianAppointment
Context triple: [Te Awa Tupua, hasGuardianAppointment, jointly appointed by the Crown and iwi]
  • A. hasGuardianCharacter
    Indicates that one entity serves as a guardian or protective character for another entity.
  • B. hasGuardianCommunity
    Indicates that an entity is under the protection, oversight, or care of a specific guardian community.
  • C. guardianAppointedFor
    Indicates that one entity has been formally designated as the legal guardian responsible for another entity.
  • D. hasParentalUnit
    Indicates that an entity has a parent or guardian that serves as its primary caregiving or parental figure.
  • E. hasGuardianFigureType
    Indicates the type or role of a guardian figure associated with an entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dccf7481909264a1844a2e9100 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4520dd9508190872a71d3722228e2 completed April 19, 2026, 3:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4f5fbcc8190a6ea9639bf5650da completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3bbb37d148190b7f38599c06594ee completed April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.