Triple

T17487096
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Susan Haack E425803 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Defending Science – Within Reason — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Defending Science – Within Reason | Statement: [Susan Haack, notableWork, Defending Science – Within Reason]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Defending Science – Within Reason
Context triple: [Susan Haack, notableWork, Defending Science – Within Reason]
  • A. Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science
    Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science is a classic skeptical book by Martin Gardner that critically examines pseudoscience, fringe theories, and popular scientific misconceptions.
  • B. The Rationality of Science
    The Rationality of Science is a philosophical work by Alan Musgrave that defends a critical rationalist account of scientific method and justification, engaging with debates over realism, theory choice, and the objectivity of scientific knowledge.
  • C. A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief
    A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief is the subtitle of Francis Collins’s book *The Language of God*, in which he argues that scientific discovery and Christian faith are compatible.
  • D. Common Sense, Science and Scepticism
    Common Sense, Science and Scepticism is a philosophical work by Alan Musgrave that defends scientific realism and examines the roles of common sense and critical doubt in scientific inquiry.
  • E. Science: Good, Bad and Bogus
    Science: Good, Bad and Bogus is a collection of essays by Martin Gardner critically examining pseudoscience, fringe theories, and common scientific misconceptions.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Defending Science – Within Reason
Target entity description: Defending Science – Within Reason is a philosophical work by Susan Haack that critically examines the nature, methods, and limits of scientific inquiry while defending science against both radical skepticism and uncritical scientism.
  • A. Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science
    Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science is a classic skeptical book by Martin Gardner that critically examines pseudoscience, fringe theories, and popular scientific misconceptions.
  • B. The Rationality of Science
    The Rationality of Science is a philosophical work by Alan Musgrave that defends a critical rationalist account of scientific method and justification, engaging with debates over realism, theory choice, and the objectivity of scientific knowledge.
  • C. A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief
    A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief is the subtitle of Francis Collins’s book *The Language of God*, in which he argues that scientific discovery and Christian faith are compatible.
  • D. Common Sense, Science and Scepticism
    Common Sense, Science and Scepticism is a philosophical work by Alan Musgrave that defends scientific realism and examines the roles of common sense and critical doubt in scientific inquiry.
  • E. Science: Good, Bad and Bogus
    Science: Good, Bad and Bogus is a collection of essays by Martin Gardner critically examining pseudoscience, fringe theories, and common scientific misconceptions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dccf7481909264a1844a2e9100 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451d2a5208190b25944626e779fdc completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.