Triple
T17486909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | pragmatic maxim |
E425799
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Peirce's maxim |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Peirce's maxim | Statement: [pragmatic maxim, alsoKnownAs, Peirce's maxim]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Peirce's maxim Context triple: [pragmatic maxim, alsoKnownAs, Peirce's maxim]
-
A.
Occam's razor
Occam's razor is a philosophical and scientific principle that advises preferring the simplest explanation that adequately accounts for all observed facts.
-
B.
pragmatic maxim
chosen
The pragmatic maxim is a philosophical principle formulated by Charles Sanders Peirce that defines the meaning of concepts in terms of their practical, observable consequences.
-
C.
The Criterion between truth and falsehood
"The Criterion between truth and falsehood" is the English rendering of the title of Surah Al-Furqan, a chapter of the Qur’an that emphasizes the distinction between guidance and misguidance through divine revelation.
-
D.
Gricean maxims
Gricean maxims are a set of conversational principles proposed by philosopher H. P. Grice that explain how speakers and listeners cooperate to communicate meaning effectively and implicature beyond literal words.
-
E.
Bar-Hillel–Carnap paradox
The Bar-Hillel–Carnap paradox is a result in the philosophy of information theory showing that, under certain formal measures, logically true statements can be assigned maximal information content, leading to a counterintuitive tension between logical truth and informational value.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dccf7481909264a1844a2e9100 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e451d2a5208190b25944626e779fdc |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.