Triple

T17483070
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Indigenous languages of California E425712 entity
Predicate hasLanguage P15 FINISHED
Object Yurok language NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yurok language | Statement: [Indigenous languages of California, hasLanguage, Yurok language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yurok language
Context triple: [Indigenous languages of California, hasLanguage, Yurok language]
  • A. Yurok language chosen
    The Yurok language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Yurok people of northwestern California.
  • B. Karuk language
    The Karuk language is an indigenous Native American language traditionally spoken by the Karuk people of northwestern California along the Klamath River.
  • C. Pit River language
    Pit River language is a Native American language of the Achumawi people traditionally spoken in northeastern California.
  • D. Klamath–Modoc language
    The Klamath–Modoc language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Klamath and Modoc peoples of southern Oregon and northern California.
  • E. Siletz Dee-ni language
    Siletz Dee-ni language is an Athabaskan Native American language traditionally spoken by the Siletz people of the central Oregon coast and now the focus of revitalization efforts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dccf7481909264a1844a2e9100 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451d06c2881909632845dd7a6b1e3 completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.