Triple
T17480783
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lasi people |
E425651
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesLanguageIn |
P108903
|
FINISHED |
| Object | daily communication |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: daily communication | Statement: [Lasi people, usesLanguageIn, daily communication]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLanguageIn Context triple: [Lasi people, usesLanguageIn, daily communication]
-
A.
usesLanguageFor
chosen
Indicates that an entity employs a particular language as a tool or medium to perform some activity, function, or purpose.
-
B.
usesLanguageAs
Indicates that one entity communicates or operates using another entity as its language or linguistic medium.
-
C.
usedInLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a word, expression, or symbol) is employed or occurs within a particular language.
-
D.
includesLanguage
Indicates that one entity contains, supports, or makes use of a specified language as part of its content, functionality, or representation.
-
E.
usesWorkingLanguagesOf
Indicates that one entity employs or operates using the working languages associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dccf7481909264a1844a2e9100 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e451bfd75481908c20bc2c1cbff593 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4f341c88190adabe526d8903b05 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.