Triple

T17480120
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hudgens v. NLRB E425633 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board | Statement: [Hudgens v. NLRB, fullName, Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board
Context triple: [Hudgens v. NLRB, fullName, Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board]
  • A. Hudgens v. NLRB chosen
    Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
  • B. BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB
    BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when an employer’s unsuccessful but reasonably based lawsuit against a union can be treated as an unfair labor practice under federal labor law.
  • C. National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
    National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
  • D. Hurd v. Hodge
    Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Hague v. CIO
    Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451bf1e8081909f4d4b8992412e62 completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.