Triple

T17480080
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ingraham v. Wright E425632 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object James Ingraham et al. v. J. R. Wright, Principal, et al. — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: James Ingraham et al. v. J. R. Wright, Principal, et al. | Statement: [Ingraham v. Wright, fullName, James Ingraham et al. v. J. R. Wright, Principal, et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: James Ingraham et al. v. J. R. Wright, Principal, et al.
Context triple: [Ingraham v. Wright, fullName, James Ingraham et al. v. J. R. Wright, Principal, et al.]
  • A. Ingraham v. Wright chosen
    Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
  • B. Wright v. United States
    Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
  • C. Barker v. Wingo
    Barker v. Wingo is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a four-factor balancing test for determining whether a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial has been violated.
  • D. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • E. Strader v. Graham
    Strader v. Graham was an 1851 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory, foreshadowing the reasoning later used in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451bf1e8081909f4d4b8992412e62 completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.