Triple
T17480008
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stone v. Graham |
E425630
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPerCuriam |
P127616
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Stone v. Graham, isPerCuriam, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPerCuriam Context triple: [Stone v. Graham, isPerCuriam, true]
-
A.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
B.
isCourtOfRecord
Indicates that a particular court maintains a permanent, authoritative record of its proceedings and has the power to fine or imprison for contempt.
-
C.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
E.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e451bf1e8081909f4d4b8992412e62 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4f341c88190adabe526d8903b05 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3bbb37d148190b7f38599c06594ee |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.