Triple
T17479873
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Goss v. Lopez |
E425627
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ingraham v. Wright |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
Named-entity recognition
Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ingraham v. Wright | Statement: [Goss v. Lopez, relatedCase, Ingraham v. Wright]
Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)
The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ingraham v. Wright Context triple: [Goss v. Lopez, relatedCase, Ingraham v. Wright]
-
A.
Ingraham v. Wright
chosen
Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
-
B.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Weaver v. Graham
Weaver v. Graham is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that retroactive reductions in prison good-time credits violate the prohibition on ex post facto laws.
-
E.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
| Stage | Batch ID | Job type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| creating | batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 |
elicitation | completed |
| NER | batch_69e451bf1e8081909f4d4b8992412e62 |
ner | completed |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.